Performance James Cook
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 | 67 | 3.9 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | REC | YDS | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 | 187 | 4.7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Performance Travis Kelce
REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|
7 | 117 | 16.7 | 49 | 1 |
Season stats based on the past 7 days |
REC | YDS | AVG | LONG | TD |
---|---|---|---|---|
7 | 117 | 16.7 | 49 | 1 |
Season stats based on the past 14 days |
Redzone Touches James Cook
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | ARI | π | π | π |
2 | @MIA | π | π | π |
3 | JAC | π | π | π |
4 | @BAL | π | π | π |
5 | @HOU | π | π | π |
6 | @NYJ | π | π | π |
7 | TEN | π | π | π |
8 | @SEA | π | π | π |
9 | MIA | π | π | π |
10 | @IND | π | π | π |
11 | KC | π | π | π |
13 | BYE | π | π | π |
14 | SF | π | π | π |
15 | @LAR | π | π | π |
16 | @DET | π | π | π |
17 | NE | π | π | π |
18 | NYJ | π | π | π |
19 | @NE | π | π | π |
20 | DEN | π | π | π |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
Redzone Touches Travis Kelce
REDZONE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
WK | OPP | ATT | TAR | REC |
1 | BAL | π | π | π |
2 | CIN | π | π | π |
3 | @ATL | π | π | π |
4 | @LAC | π | π | π |
5 | NO | π | π | π |
7 | BYE | π | π | π |
8 | @SF | π | π | π |
9 | @LV | π | π | π |
10 | TB | π | π | π |
11 | DEN | π | π | π |
12 | @BUF | π | π | π |
13 | @CAR | π | π | π |
14 | LV | π | π | π |
15 | LAC | π | π | π |
16 | @CLE | π | π | π |
17 | HOU | π | π | π |
18 | @PIT | π | π | π |
20 | @DEN | π | π | π |
Redzone data is for premium members only.
OWN/START Travis Kelce
Expert Consensus James Cook
Expert Consensus Travis Kelce
Breakdown James Cook
- Just about every team utilizies the dreaded 'running backs by comittee' policy. Two solid #1 starters are hard to find.
- Experts don't even rank him among RB's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 7th with 260.90 total points (13.73 avg).
- Currently 108.9 points behind the leader: Saquon Barkley
- Top 35 in receptions and is currently ranked 33rd among RB.
- Top 35 in targets and is currently ranked 32nd among RB.
- Top 20 in Rec TDs with 2 and is currently ranked 18th among RB.
- Top 35 in red zone targets and is currently ranked 26th among RB.
- Top 15 in red zone attempts and is currently ranked 12th among RB.
- Top 25 in rush attempts with 207 (12.18 per game) and is currently ranked 21st among RB.
- Top 20 in rush yards with 1009 (59.35 per game) and is currently ranked 16th among RB.
- Top 3 in rush tds with 16 (0.94 per game) and is currently ranked 2nd among RB.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Rush Yards: +47, Rush AVG: -0.1 Rush TDs: +15, Receptions: -8, Rec Yards: -162 Rec TDs: -2,
- Unfortunately two players have the same exact name and his rating may not be entirely accurate at this point. We are working on fixing situations like this!
- RUSH ATT: 220, RUSH YDS: 1050, RUSH TDS: 14, REC: 40, REC YDS: 335, REC TDS: 2
Overview
Receiving Stats
Rushing Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Breakdown Travis Kelce
- Experts don't even rank him among TE's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 9th with 116.10 total points (6.45 avg).
- Currently 42.5 points behind the leader: George Kittle
- Average points in the past two weeks have increased by 11.3 PPG. That is great, but how long can he perform at this level? If you don't have the confidence he can keep it up, then trade him for a sure thing.
- Top 3 in receptions and is currently ranked 3rd among TE.
- Top 3 in targets and is currently ranked 3rd among TE.
- Top 3 in red zone targets and is currently ranked 1st among TE.
- Top 3 in red zone receptions and is currently ranked 1st among TE.
- Top 6 in reception yards with 823 and 8.48 YPC and is currently ranked 5th among TE.
- Top 25 in Rec TDs with 3 and is currently ranked 23rd among TE.
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Receptions: -2, Rec Yards: -125 Rec TDs: -1,
- Catches per game are very high for a tight end!
- REC: 78, REC YDS: 840, REC TDS: 7
Overview
Receiving Stats
Bonus Qualities
Season Outlook
Injury James Cook
No Injury Reported
Injury Travis Kelce
No Injury Reported
Matchups James Cook
Week 3
Buffalo Bills VS Jacksonville Jaguars
PA/G | YDS/G | TO | INT | SACK | TDs | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25.44 | 399.50 | 8 | 6 | 31 | 1 | 2.05 |
Compare to same point last season |
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 31st with 57.00 total points (3.56 avg).
- Currently 133 points behind the leader: Texans DST
- Decline in numbers lately by 3.6 PPG.
Defensive Stats
- Ranked 18th in rush defense with 2017 (126.06 per game).
- Ranked 32nd in pass defense with 4375 (273.44 per game).
- One of the worst in points against with 25.44 per game and currently ranked 26th among DST.
- Currently ranked 26th in Total TDs with 1 (0.06 per game) among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: +72.34, Turnovers: -20 Sacks: -10, INTs: -9, TDs: -3, Points Allowed: +3.39,
Season Outlook
- SACK: 42, INT: 13, TDS: 3, PA/G: 23.2, YDS/G: 364.3
Matchups Travis Kelce
Week 3
Kansas City Chiefs @ Atlanta Falcons
PA/G | YDS/G | TO | INT | SACK | TDs | FSP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25.13 | 354.69 | 18 | 12 | 28 | 4 | 2.36 |
Compare to same point last season |
Overview
- Experts don"t even rank him among DST's. Either he is on a bye week or is just plain bad. Based on his stats from the past 30 days, he is currently ranked 19th with 90.00 total points (5.63 avg).
- Currently 100 points behind the leader: Texans DST
- Average points in the past two weeks have dipped quite a bit at 5.6.
Defensive Stats
- Ranked 16th in rush defense with 1919 (119.94 per game).
- Ranked 16th in pass defense with 3756 (234.75 per game).
- One of the worst in points against with 25.13 per game and currently ranked 24th among DST.
- Top 6 in Total TDs with 4 (0.25 per game) and currently ranked 5th among DST.
Bonus Qualities
- At this point in the season his numbers compared to last years: Total Yards Against: +36.57, Turnovers: +1 Sacks: -10, INTs: +4, TDs: +3, Points Allowed: +6.07,
Season Outlook
- SACK: 43, INT: 12, TDS: 2, PA/G: 23.3, YDS/G: 341.1
Rating James Cook
Rating Travis Kelce
Career James Cook
RUSH | RECEIVING | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | BUF | 16 | 91 | 525 | 5.8 | 2 | 33 | 21 | 180 | 8.6 | 1 | ||
2023 | BUF | 16 | 237 | 1122 | 4.7 | 2 | 54 | 44 | 445 | 10.1 | 4 | ||
2024 | BUF | 16 | 207 | 1009 | 4.9 | 16 | 38 | 32 | 258 | 8.1 | 2 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 18 | 196 | 949 | 4.8 | 7 | 45 | 35 | 303 | 8.7 | 2 | |||
Totals | 56 | 628 | 3035 | 4.8 | 22 | 137 | 108 | 924 | 8.6 | 7 |
Career Travis Kelce
RECEIVING | RUSH | ||||||||||||
YEAR | TEAM | GP | TGTS | REC | YD | AVG | TD | ATT | YD | AVG | TD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | KC | 16 | 87 | 67 | 862 | 12.9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2015 | KC | 16 | 103 | 72 | 875 | 12.2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2016 | KC | 16 | 117 | 85 | 1125 | 13.2 | 4 | 1 | -5 | -5 | 0 | ||
2017 | KC | 15 | 122 | 83 | 1038 | 12.5 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | ||
2018 | KC | 16 | 150 | 103 | 1336 | 13.0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2019 | KC | 16 | 136 | 97 | 1229 | 12.7 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | ||
2020 | KC | 15 | 145 | 105 | 1416 | 13.5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2021 | KC | 16 | 135 | 92 | 1125 | 12.2 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1 | ||
2022 | KC | 16 | 152 | 110 | 1338 | 12.2 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | ||
2023 | KC | 15 | 121 | 93 | 984 | 10.6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
2024 | KC | 16 | 133 | 97 | 823 | 8.5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
3-YEAR AVG | 18 | 156 | 118 | 1225 | 10.4 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 2.8 | 0 | |||
Totals | 184 | 1512 | 1095 | 13159 | 12.0 | 87 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 2 |